feisty
Australian women in environmental law are doing some of the most consequential legal work in the country right now. They're running climate litigation that reaches the Federal Court, advising mining and renewables proponents on approvals, and drafting the regulatory frameworks that determine whether a wetland survives or a reef gets a coastal development next to it. The field sits at the crossroads of science, policy, and advocacy, and women are leading it at every level.
Why environmental law is having a moment
Environmental law has expanded faster than almost any other practice area over the past decade. The expansion is driven by three things: the pace of Australia's energy transition, tightening biodiversity obligations, and a wave of climate litigation that has forced courts to engage with questions they once treated as policy-only. That means more work, more specialisation, and more organisations competing for practitioners who can handle the science as well as the law.
It's also a field that has attracted women in high numbers for longer than most parts of the legal profession. That pipeline is now producing senior practitioners, partners, and advocates who shape outcomes at the highest level. The women below represent a cross-section of that cohort: barristers, solicitors, academics, and public advocates working across government, private practice, and the non-profit sector.
The practitioners shaping the field
Fiona McLeod SC is one of Australia's most recognised senior counsel working at the intersection of human rights and environmental protection. McLeod has appeared in native title matters and in cases that connect land degradation to the rights of First Nations communities. She has argued before the High Court and sits on the board of the Australian Institute of International Affairs.
Carole Broderick leads the environmental and planning practice at a major national firm and has advised proponents and objectors in some of the country's largest infrastructure approvals. Broderick's work spans the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, state planning laws, and the increasingly complex interface between federal climate commitments and project-level approvals.
Rachel Pepper served as Queensland's first Independent Integrity Commissioner and, before that, as President of the Land Court of Queensland. Pepper built a reputation for rigorous, science-informed decision-making on mining and resource matters, including decisions that required weighing Adani-era coal approvals against climate impact evidence.
Elaine Johnson directs the environmental law program at the Environmental Defenders Office in New South Wales, one of the oldest and most active community legal centres in the country focused exclusively on environmental matters. Johnson has run litigation protecting urban green space, threatened species habitat, and coastal communities from inappropriate development.
Professor Lee Godden holds a chair in law at the University of Melbourne and directs the Centre for Resources, Energy and Environmental Law. Godden's research on property rights, water law, and regulatory governance has informed policy at both state and federal level. Her written work is regularly cited in parliamentary inquiries and in court decisions involving resource allocation.
Nari Sahukar is a senior lawyer at the Australian Conservation Foundation and one of the country's most active environmental litigators. Sahukar focuses on using existing laws to their limit, including challenging approvals under the EPBC Act and pursuing cases where regulators have failed to enforce their own rules. Sahukar is also a prolific public communicator on what environmental law can and can't do.
Dr Phoebe Slater is a barrister specialising in climate law and the legal obligations that flow from Australia's emissions commitments. Slater has written on directors' duties in the context of climate risk, and her work informs both litigation strategy and the advice being given to ASX-listed boards about disclosure and transition planning. For context on how those board-level conversations are evolving, the analysis of when the chief sustainability officer reports to the CFO tracks the same pressure from a structural angle.
Jacinta Ruru is a New Zealand-based scholar whose comparative work on indigenous environmental rights, particularly around water and land title, has been widely read and cited in Australian native title contexts. Ruru's framework for understanding the legal status of rivers as rights-holding entities has been applied in Australian policy discussions.
Melissa Perry served on the Federal Court of Australia and heard significant environmental matters including disputes about offshore petroleum regulation and biosecurity. Perry brought scientific literacy and a willingness to engage with complex technical evidence to her role on the bench, qualities that practitioners in the field have noted publicly.
The advocacy organisations they lead
The Environmental Defenders Offices operate across multiple states and territories, and women lead or have led several of them. The EDO model, which provides free and low-cost legal advice to communities and individuals facing environmental harm, depends on experienced practitioners willing to take on cases that private firms wouldn't. The women who run these organisations carry significant institutional knowledge about how Australian environmental law is applied in practice, not just on paper.
The Australian Conservation Foundation's legal team, the Wilderness Society's advocacy staff, and the legal arms of several state environment councils are also led disproportionately by women. This isn't coincidence. The field's combination of technical complexity and explicit public interest mission has drawn women who might otherwise have gone into corporate law, and who have stayed because the work matters beyond billing targets.
What the next decade looks like
Australia's environmental law framework faces significant pressure on at least three fronts. The EPBC Act review, which recommended wholesale reform, has produced partial legislative change but left the architecture of federal approval processes largely intact. State planning laws are being rewritten in multiple jurisdictions simultaneously. And climate litigation is moving from first-generation cases about disclosure and process to second-generation cases about actual liability for harm.
The women in this field are positioned at the centre of all three. Several are advising the government bodies writing the new rules. Several are running the cases that will define what the new rules mean. And a cohort of academics is producing the scholarship that courts and parliaments will draw on when they need to understand what the law requires.
That's a different kind of influence from what appears on a standard list of partners or equity holders. It's structural. The field of Australian women in law more broadly has made significant gains in senior partnerships and general counsel roles, but environmental law is one of the few areas where women have shaped the field's intellectual foundations as much as its practice.
The practitioners named here are a starting point. Environmental law in Australia is practiced by hundreds of women across every state and territory, in firms, in community organisations, in universities, and in government. The field is producing more of them every year, and the cases they take on are getting harder, more consequential, and more watched.